Masthead header

how to photograph kids: a sharp or non-sharp photo | phoenix children’s photographer

“Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.” Henri Cartier Bresson

What is a successful photograph? A sharp photograph v a non-sharp photograph – are either of the above photos bad pictures?

Is a photograph bad because it is not sharp? If a photograph is sharp, does that make it a good photo?

Cartier Bresson’s statement reminds us that a successful shot is not entirely based on technical quality. The photographer brings their own experiences to a photograph. The moment and the feeling are what dictates a photographer’s choice. A sharp image or a non-sharp image illustrates a photographer’s vision.

Don’t let someone tell you that a photograph that is not sharp is a failure. Don’t throw a photo away because it is not sharp, throw it away because it doesn’t move you. Would you hang the photograph on your wall? Does the photograph illustrate the moment? Does the content inspire you? If you answered yes to any of these questions, then your photograph was successful.

There are plenty of photographers with work sharper than Cartier Bresson’s, but none are more famous.

PS A photograph is not creative just because it is not sharp. It still has to be a good picture. The content has to justify your choice.
The photos above were both photographed with a manual focus film camera.

Kristen - September 21, 2012 - 10:15 pm

GREAT post. I always struggle w/this concept. I love the out of focus shots, but it seems as if mine And what I imagine in my mind never turns out in the image. Ugh.

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*